What the SCOTUS Rio Grande ruling could mean for other rivers
The Supreme Court's rejection of a water-sharing deal for the Rio Grande leaves the future of the river's management uncertain amid federal concerns and ongoing legal battles.
What the SCOTUS Rio Grande ruling could mean for other rivers
The Supreme Court's rejection of a water-sharing deal for the Rio Grande leaves the future of the river's management uncertain amid federal concerns and ongoing legal battles.
In Texas v. New Mexico, the Supreme Court rejected a proposed consent decree in a water dispute over the Rio Grande, saying federal approval was needed.
Colorado enacts legislation in response to SCOTUS wetlands rule
Colorado Governor Polis signed key legislation, including HB24-1379, to protect wetlands and state waters from pollution and degradation, ensuring sustainable water resources.
American Rivers' 2004 list of endangered rivers reveals that New Mexico faces the most significant statewide river challenges, mainly due to a U.S. Supreme Court decision affecting clean water...
Can states settle Rio Grande water fight without U.S. approval?
The Supreme Court will decide if a settlement over Rio Grande water rights between Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado can proceed without federal government approval, potentially setting a precedent for...
SCOTUS to review Texas v. New Mexico, Colorado, a decades-long water rights dispute involving the 1938 Rio Grande Compact and federal objections to the states' settlement agreement.