Groundwater in New Mexico ghost town partially forfeited

Railway track
Spread the love

Western water users are familiar with abandonment and forfeiture penalties for non-use of surface water, considered a public resource subject to appropriation.  What that means is that unused waters revert to the state.  New Mexico expands the concept to groundwater.

The NM Political ReportOpens in a new tab. writes that the state’s supreme court recently issued a partial forfeiture of groundwater rights to a well in Cutter, a ghost town that was once a mining community.  A well purchased in 1994 for its groundwater rights was drilled in 1920 to provide water to a railroad depot and livestock.  Over the years, the well was used solely for livestock after mining operations and the railroad closed.  “A special master assigned to the case calculated that the railroad had rights to about 108 acre-feet of water and that about three-acre feet had been used annually for watering livestock. The special master also found that water from the well had not been used for anything other than livestock from 1960 until 1995,” writes the Political Report.

The court said in its unanimous ruling that the bulk of the 108-acre feet of groundwater was not used, finding that what is actually used is the basis for a water right.

The ruling clarifies whether a partial forfeiture is available under state law.  According to the Santa Fe – New Mexican, state law “allows the forfeiture of groundwater rights if the well is no longer serving a beneficial use, but the statute doesn’t say whether a portion of the rights can be forfeited. The state Supreme Court’s decision settled that question, clearly ruling the law permits the forfeiture of rights to any unused portion of groundwater. It doesn’t have to be all or nothing.”





Since 1995, Deborah has owned and operated LegalTech LLC with a focus on water rights. Before moving to Arizona in 1986, she worked as a quality control analyst for Honeywell and in commercial real estate, both in Texas. She learned about Arizona's water rights from the late and great attorney Michael Brophy of Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite. Her side interests are writing (and reading), Wordpress programming and much more.

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Recent Posts

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
Skip to content