A case involving rights to the Rio Grande styled Texas vs. New Mexico and Colorado, No. 141, Original, has been before the United States Supreme Court for eight years. Filed with the Supreme Court in 2014, no lower court has heard the case because it involves multiple states.
As reported in El Paso Matters, the dispute arose over Texas’ allegation that New Mexico’s groundwater pumping was pulling water out of the river, depriving Texas of its rights under the 1938 Rio Grande Compact. Fortune Magazine adds that New Mexico says that it has been shorted its share of water in the river. A judge in the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals was appointed as a special master. A timeline of pleadings is published on SCOTUS Blog, and the docket and documents filed with the Special Master are available at the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals website.
In an order issued today, the Special Master stayed litigation in the case pending completion of several requirements, including a deadline for New Mexico, Texas, and Colorado to file a motion to adopt their proposed settlement decree by or on November 14, 2022, with accompanying briefs and supporting appendices. The proposed settlement decree and appendices are to be filed under seal.
El Paso Matters and other publications are reporting that the federal government, which manages several dams and canals along the Rio Grande system, and water districts subject to international treaties with Mexico, are opposed to a settlement between the three states.
Since 1995, Deborah has owned and operated LegalTech LLC with a focus on water rights. Before moving to Arizona in 1986, she worked as a quality control analyst for Honeywell and in commercial real estate, both in Texas. She learned about Arizona's water rights from the late and great attorney Michael Brophy of Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite. Her side interests are writing (and reading), Wordpress programming and much more.
Ut oh, this isnt good. “publications are reporting that the federal government, which manages several dams and canals along the Rio Grande system, and water districts subject to international treaties with Mexico, are opposed to a settlement between the three states.”
USDA invests nearly $2 million to improve clean water access in rural California, funding infrastructure upgrades and operator training in multiple communities.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Leave a Reply