March 27, 2023 – Late last year, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of the Army announced their final rule establishing a new definition of “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”).
The Clean Water Act, originally enacted in 1972, aims to protect and maintain the nation’s water resources by regulating pollution discharges into surface waters. The scope of WOTUS has been a subject of debate and legal interpretation over the years, as different administrations and courts have interpreted it in many ways. Its definition has significant implications for landowners, industries, and developers, as it determines which water bodies are subject to federal jurisdiction and regulation. This includes requirements for permits, pollution controls, and other protective measures. Waters covered under WOTUS may include rivers, lakes, streams, wetlands, and other water bodies that can have a significant impact on the health of downstream navigable waters.
Wetlands. One case, Sackett v. EPA, is still awaiting a ruling from the Supreme Court. This case focuses on whether certain wetlands are considered WOTUS.
Enforcement Blocked. In another lawsuit, Texas and Idaho recently received a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The court blocked the enforcement of a new WOTUS definition, but only in these two states. The agencies involved, the Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers, were restricted from enforcing the revised rule published on January 18th. The court did not grant a request to block enforcement nationwide, as reported by the Associated Builders and Contractors.
Overreach. 24 states are still waiting for a ruling in a joint lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota. These states argue that the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers have overreached their legal authority by expanding control over waters already regulated by the states, according to Progressive Farmer. The states involved include Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Farmers and ranchers say they are particularly disadvantaged by the WOTUS rule, which may extend federal regulation to stockponds or small, intermittent water flows, some of which might not even originate on their land.
Earlier this month, the U.S. House of Representatives voted to appeal portions of WOTUS that include wetlands and seasonal or ephemeral streams in a basic definition of water bodies. If the legislation limiting the scope of WOTUS is also passed by the Senate, President Biden has vowed a veto. States such as New Mexico worry about the effect of constantly changing federal regulations on their ability to regulate surface water.
Since 1995, Deborah has owned and operated LegalTech LLC with a focus on water rights. Before moving to Arizona in 1986, she worked as a quality control analyst for Honeywell and in commercial real estate, both in Texas. She learned about Arizona's water rights from the late and great attorney Michael Brophy of Ryley, Carlock & Applewhite. Her side interests are writing (and reading), Wordpress programming and much more.
Utah Division of Natural Resources and US Bureau of Reclamation finalize a detailed plan to assess water resources, forecast demand, and develop sustainable solutions to save the declining Great Salt...
Wyoming passes legislation investing in comprehensive water management strategies including studies, infrastructure upgrades, cloud seeding research, and collaboration with federal conservation...
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Leave a Reply